योग्य उत्तर: पर्याय (२) Only (b) and (c)
सविस्तर स्पष्टीकरण:
•
वाक्य (a) चुकीचे आहे: "If he takes (Simple Present)... he would reach..." $\rightarrow$ takes सोबत 'will reach' हवे, 'would reach' नाही.
•
वाक्य (b) बरोबर आहे: "If you whistled (V2 - Simple Past), the girls would mind (would + V1) it." $\rightarrow$ Type 2 Conditional ची रचना तंतोतंत अचूक आहे.
•
वाक्य (c) बरोबर आहे: "If your work is over, go home and enjoy T.V." $\rightarrow$ If-क्लॉज नंतर आज्ञार्थी वाक्य (Imperative sentence) वापरण्याची रचना व्याकरणात पूर्णपणे प्रमाण मानली जाते.
•
वाक्य (d) चुकीचे आहे: "If he behaved (V2)... she would have loved (would have + V3)..." $\rightarrow$ भूतकाळी रूपाबरोबर (behaved) 'would love' हवे, किंवा If-क्लॉजमध्ये 'had behaved' हवे होते.
त्यामुळे केवळ (b) आणि (c) ही वाक्ये बरोबर आहेत.
Conditional वाक्यात मुख्य क्लॉज आज्ञार्थी (Imperative) असू शकतो (उदा. 'If you are tired, take rest').
translate
English Explanation / स्पष्टीकरण:
Correct Answer: Option (2) Only (b) and (c)
Detailed Explanation:
•
Sentence (a) is incorrect: Mismatched tenses. Present *takes* cannot be followed by past conditional *would reach* (should be *will reach*).
•
Sentence (b) is correct: "If you whistled (Simple Past - V2), the girls would mind (would + V1) it." $\rightarrow$ Flawless Second Conditional (Type 2).
•
Sentence (c) is correct: "If your work is over, go home and enjoy T.V." $\rightarrow$ An imperative result clause (*go home and enjoy*) following an *if-clause* is standard English usage.
•
Sentence (d) is incorrect: Mismatched conditional. Simple past *behaved* cannot pair with *would have loved* (requires *had behaved*).
Therefore, only (b) and (c) are correct.
An *if-clause* can be followed by an imperative sentence in the main clause for instructions or advice.
